The verdict served as an important test of Durham’s investigative work. The jury decided Sussmann was not guilty of lying to the FBI. The FBI ultimately investigated the allegations of unusual transactions between Trump’s business and the Russian bank and found they were unsubstantiated. Prosecutors have alleged that the Clinton campaign tried to seed information to the FBI and leaked it to news reporters in an attempt to tar Trump in during the campaign. The outcome of the Durham probe will shed light on whether political operatives working for Democrats were able to influence FBI investigations into Trump during the 2016 campaign season. Trump’s former attorney general William Barr appointed Durham to launch the probe in October 2020, in the final weeks of the 2020 presidential election. The Sussmann trial was the first public airing in a courtroom of how much special counsel John Durham has uncovered in his investigation into whether federal law enforcement officials illegally investigated the 2016 Trump campaign. “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” That same day, Russian actors sent phishing emails to accounts used by Clinton’s campaign and office, special counsel Robert Mueller found. On July 27, 2016, during a televised press conference, Trump looked into the cameras and encouraged the Russian government to intervene to find emails allegedly deleted from Clinton’s personal servers and make them public. Trump himself gave voters plenty of reason to believe he welcomed Russian assistance in defeating Clinton. Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager Robby Mook testified on May 20 that Clinton agreed with the campaign’s decision to tell reporters about the potential Trump-Russia internet connection. Prosecutors alleged that Sussmann was part of a wider effort by the Clinton campaign to tarnish Trump in the weeks leading up to Election Day. What does this have to do with Hillary Clinton? The case was heard in federal court in Washington, D.C., and hinged on whether Sussmann disclosed to Baker in that initial encounter that he was there representing clients. Sussmann’s defense team denied Sussmann lied in the meeting. In that initial meeting, prosecutors alleged that Sussmann told Baker that he wasn’t representing a client in bringing the information to authorities, when in fact he was representing the Clinton campaign and the technology executive who had helped compile the data analysis. Sussmann was charged with lying to the FBI when he brought those allegations to the attention of the FBI’s top lawyer, James A. 19, 2016, where he presented research that he said showed unusual computer traffic between Donald Trump’s business and Alfa-Bank. lawyer and a former prosecutor with the Department of Justice’s criminal division who had a meeting with a senior FBI official on Sept. The FBI investigated the allegations and the logs and concluded that there wasn’t evidence of such a link. government concluded there were suspicious contacts between Alfa-Bank computers and servers controlled by Trump’s businesses. A tech firm with a pending federal contract to do forensic analysis of efforts by other countries to hack the U.S. In 2020, the bank reported more than 20 million customers and $60 billion in assets. Alfa-Bank is one of Russia’s largest banks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |